Archetype Theory
 |
|
Plato
Karl
G. Jung
|
The
biology of beauty:
"What
is this "Phi Mask" anyway?
We
believe that it is not strictly an image of "beauty" - but actually an
image of "HUMANNESS". That
is, it is the way we identify our own species, and individuals within our
species. Like all other animals we need a way to identify our own species for
mating, bonding, self- protection and other survival purposes. Also we need to
be able to distinguish healthy and disease free individuals within our species
for similar purposes. Other
animals recognize their own species through one or a combination of their
senses. Moths
and butterflies, for example, recognize each other through smell - the olfactory
sense. They are able to recognize or identify
other
moths by their scents (or "pheromones") from up to 3 miles away.
This
is how they identify "mothness".
Dogs
recognize each other by a combination of vision and smell. They initially visually
identify another animal as a "dog" and
immediately approach it to smell it and ascertain its degree of "dogness",
as well as other information about that dog.
Dolphins
recognize their species and individuals within their species through the sense
of sound. The
degree of one dolphin's acceptance of another is its dependent on its perception
of that other dolphin's sounds like a dolphin. These
sounds create its species identity, or "dolphinness". Elephants
appear to use a combination of sound, vision and smell.
Few
people have any argument that these animal behaviors are all instinctual
behaviors that are genetically encoded and subconsciously driven. We
are animals too.
Humans,
however, have historically had a hard time seeing and regarding themselves as
"animals". We
have named ourselves "Homo Sapiens Sapiens" or "Man Wise
Wise". In fact if other animals had an opportunity to rename us they would
more likely have called us "Man
the annihilator of all species and destroyer of the planet" or
something to that effect.
We
have taken great pride in understanding and controlling our planet and all the
other species on it. But
our own ego has led us somewhat astray with regard to understanding ourselves.
We
are, in fact, much like other animals. And
like other animals, to a tremendous degree, we are a product of our genetic
makeup. Most
of us in science now believe that genetics, much more than environment,
determines the lion's share of who we are and who we become. Humans are animals, but more specifically we are a visual animal. We
essentially recognize each other by sight. We cannot smell
each other more than a few feet away, and if someone yells our name we
immediately turn to see, or "visually" identify, who they are. Part
of our genetic code is a subconscious image of what "human" is
supposed to be. The primary image of "humanness" is the genetically coded
visual image of an "ideal" human face. The more a face resembles this
"Ideal Human Face Image" - the more we perceive it to be human. When a face is perceived to be
human that perception sets off in us a conscious response of
"attraction" and "positive emotion".
If
this subconscious visual perception of "humanness", if strong enough
(that is if the face we see looks enough like our subconscious image of
"humanness"), then the conscious response will be elevated to a
combination of a sense of "strong attraction" and a sense of
"strong positive emotion". "Beauty"
is defined as "the quality or combination of qualities in an entity which
evokes in the perceiver a combination of a sense of "strong
attraction" and a sense of "strong positive emotion". Thus
we can postulate that the perception or "recognition" of beauty is actually nothing more
than a strong correlation
of what we subconsciously expect "humanness" to appear to be.
ARCHETYPES:
Plato
(427-347 BCE) discussed his "Forms", postulating that all objects have
an "ideal" "form" or structure. In particular, he taught that these "Forms" were pure or perfect objects of mathematical or
other conceptual knowledge.
He felt that these "pure" forms existed only in the realm of
knowledge and never in the reality of human everyday existence.
Individual
things in the realm of appearance are beautiful only insofar as they
participate in, correlate with, or approach in structure these universal
"Forms" of Beauty.
Karl
Jung (1875-1961) took the concept of Plato's "Forms" further and presented his own
Theory of Archetypes.
In
Jungian Psychology an Archetype is "an unconscious idea, pattern of thought,
image, etc., inherited from the ancestors of the race and universally present in
individual psyches".
In
simpler terms we could basically refer to an archetype as an
"instinct".
That
is, in essence, an instinctual idea, pattern of thought, image, etc., inherited
from the ancestors of the race and universally present in individual psyches.
We
now believe that the image of the "ideal" human face is indeed
an "Archetype"; a subconscious image which we are born
with and carry throughout our lives.
This
archetype has evolved in order to help us identify members of our own species
and further sort members of our species according to their relative health and
ability to successfully reproduce and to provide other resources to us and those
who are close to us.